Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Acrothesis, derived from the Greek akrothesis meaning "placement at the extremity," represents a sophisticated rhetorical device that operates through strategic juxtaposition of opposing or contrasting elements at critical structural points within discourse. This article examines acrothesis as a figure of contrast, analyzing its function, historical development, and contemporary applications across literary and non-literary contexts. Through systematic analysis of classical and modern examples, this study demonstrates how acrothesis functions to heighten argumentative force, create memorable emphasis, and structure complex ideas through deliberate polarization. The findings suggest that acrothesis operates not merely as ornamental device but as a fundamental cognitive structure that shapes audience reception and interpretation. This investigation contributes to understanding how contrast-based figures function within broader systems of persuasive communication and stylistic construction.
References
1. Anderson, J. R. (2015). Cognitive psychology and its implications (8th ed.). Worth Publishers.
2. Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. University of California Press.
3. Cicero, M. T. (2001). On the ideal orator (J. M. May & J. Wisse, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 55 BCE)
4. Cockcroft, R., & Cockcroft, S. M. (2014). Persuading people: An introduction to rhetoric (3rd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Corbett, E. P. J., & Connors, R. J. (1999). Classical rhetoric for the modern student (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
6. Fahnestock, J. (2011). Rhetorical style: The uses of language in persuasion. Oxford University Press.
7. Hart, R. P., & Daughton, S. (2005). Modern rhetorical criticism (3rd ed.). Pearson.
8. Kennedy, J. F. (1961, January 20). Inaugural address. John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum. https://www.jfklibrary.org/
9. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
10. Lanham, R. A. (1991). A handlist of rhetorical terms (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
11. Leech, G., & Short, M. (2007). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
12. Lodge, D. (1977). The modes of modern writing: Metaphor, metonymy, and the typology of modern literature. Cornell University Press.
13. Murphy, J. J. (1974). Rhetoric in the Middle Ages: A history of rhetorical theory from Saint Augustine to the Renaissance. University of California Press.
14. Quintilian. (2001). The orator's education (D. A. Russell, Trans.). Harvard University Press. (Original work published 95 CE)
15. Verhagen, A. (2005). Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford University Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Mamaziyayev Oblaberdi Xudoberganovich