Abstract
Conflict is an unavoidable aspect of interpersonal interaction and often escalates due to ineffective emotional regulation and accusatory communication patterns. This article explores major conflict management strategies and emphasizes the role of “I-statements” as a constructive communication tool in resolving interpersonal conflicts. The study analyzes accommodative, avoidant, aggressive, compromising, and collaborative approaches, outlining their psychological and relational consequences. Particular attention is given to the collaborative strategy supported by I-statements, which facilitate emotional awareness, reduce defensiveness, and promote sustainable conflict resolution. The findings suggest that the systematic use of I-statements enhances dialogue, mutual understanding, and long-term relational stability in both personal and organizational contexts.
References
1. Deutsch, M., Coleman, P. T., & Marcus, E. C. (2011). The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
2. Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in (3rd ed.). Penguin Books.
3. Gordon, T. (2000). Parent effectiveness training. Three Rivers Press.
4. Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781
5. Rosenberg, M. B. (2015). Nonviolent communication: A language of life (3rd ed.). PuddleDancer Press.
6. Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. (1974). Thomas–Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. Xicom.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.