Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
This article distinguishes realia and barbarisms in Uzbek linguistics through nominative necessity, cultural-semantic load, and normative status. The study applies contextual analysis, comparative semantics, and close reading of diverse texts. The results propose a multi-criteria diagnostic model and demonstrate its implications for lexicography, translation practice, and stylistic norm-setting.
References
1. Vinogradov V. S. Perevod: obshchie i leksicheskie voprosy. Moskva: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2010. 240 s.
2. Vlahov S., Florin S. Neperevodimoe v perevode. Moskva: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1980. 352 s.
3. Rahmatullaev Sh. Hozirgi o‘zbek adabiy tili. Toshkent: Universitet, 2006. 320 b.
4. Abdurahmonov G‘., Shukurov Sh. O‘zbek tilining leksikologiyasi. Toshkent: O‘qituvchi, 1996. 256 b.
5. Rozental D. E., Golub I. B., Telenkova M. A. Sovremennyy russkiy yazyk: leksika i frazeologiya. Moskva: Ayris-Press, 2012. 384 s.
6. Newmark P. A Textbook of Translation. London: Prentice Hall, 1988. 292 p.
7. Baker M. In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. London: Routledge, 2011. 352 p.
8. Wierzbicka A. Understanding Cultures through Their Key Words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. 328 p.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.