Abstract
The speech act of threat is a complex communicative phenomenon that exhibits features of both commissive and directive acts. Classical interpretations classify it as a commissive act, while other scholars emphasize its directive nature, highlighting the demand aspect inherent in a threat. Modern research, including Wierzbicka, Schelinger, Pocheptsov, Gotlib, and Volf, demonstrates that a threat’s semantics combines the expression of potential negative consequences with the speaker’s intention to influence the addressee’s behavior. Pragmatic analysis identifies key components: the addressee’s non-compliance, the speaker’s capability and intention, and the social goal underlying the threat. Consequently, the speech act of threat should be considered a dual-component, context-dependent phenomenon, integrating directive, commissive, and expressive elements.
References
1. Baranov, A. N. (2001). Introduction to Applied Linguistics. Moscow: Editorial URSS.
2. Blakar, R. M. (1979). Language as a means of social power. In R. Rommetveit & R. M. Blakar (Eds.), Studies of Language, Thought and Verbal Communication (pp. 131–169). London: Academic Press.
3. Borisova, I. N. (2003). Communicative Strategies and Tactics of Speech Interaction. Moscow: KomKniga.
4. Issers, O. S. (2008). Communicative Strategies and Tactics of Russian Speech. Moscow: LKI Publishing House.
5. Krasnykh, V. V. (2001). Foundations of Psycholinguistics and Communication Theory. Moscow: Gnozis.
6. van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.