EFFECTIVNESS OF USING REAL-TIME TRANSLATION TOOLS IN TEACHING FOREIGN LANGUAGES: A COMPARATIVE PEDAGOGICAL STUDY
PDF

Keywords

machine translation, language pedagogy, Google Translate, AI tools, real-time translation, foreign language learning

How to Cite

Aziza Ravshanovna, Z. (2025). EFFECTIVNESS OF USING REAL-TIME TRANSLATION TOOLS IN TEACHING FOREIGN LANGUAGES: A COMPARATIVE PEDAGOGICAL STUDY. Advances in Science and Humanities, 1(10), 57-61. https://doi.org/10.70728/human.v01.i10.015

Abstract

The rapid evolution of real-time machine translation (MT) tools, especially AI-based systems such as Google Translate, DeepL, and ChatGPT-powered translators, has transformed the landscape of foreign language pedagogy. Over the last decade, learners have increasingly relied on MT technologies to complete tasks, interpret texts, and overcome linguistic barriers. This article presents a comparative pedagogical study investigating the effectiveness of real-time translation tools in foreign language teaching, with particular focus on comprehension, vocabulary acquisition, learner autonomy, and translation accuracy. Drawing on recent research, classroom-based observations, and comparative linguistic analysis, the article evaluates the benefits and limitations of integrating MT tools into foreign language instruction. The study finds that while real-time translation tools support rapid comprehension and expand learner independence, inappropriate or unmonitored use may hinder deep linguistic processing and reduce the development of communicative competences. The article proposes methodological recommendations for balanced pedagogical integration of MT tools in language classrooms.

PDF

References

1. Allan, K. (2020). The Routledge Handbook of Semantics. Routledge.

2. Bauer, L. (2019). Compounds and Neologisms in English Lexicology. Oxford University Press.

3. Bozorova, D. (2023). Issues of Translating Medical Terminology from English into Uzbek. Philological Studies Journal, 12(1), 45–53.

4. Cabré, M. T. (2020). Terminology and Language Planning in Medical Sciences. John Benjamins.

5. Harper, D. (2021). COVID-19 and Lexical Innovation in English Medical Discourse. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(3), 77–90.

6. Karimova, S. (2021). Comparative Aspects of English and Uzbek Medical Terms. Language and Translation Studies, 9(2), 25–34.

7. Koller, W. (2021). The Concept of Equivalence in Translation Theory Revisited. Meta Journal, 66(1), 10–29.

8. López Rúa, P. (2022). Semantic Shifts in Medical Neologisms: Translation Implications. Lexis Journal in English Lexicology, 20, 33–52.

9. Schmid, H. J. (2022). The Dynamics of the English Lexicon: Innovation and Change. Cambridge University Press.

10. Vinay, J. P., & Darbelnet, J. (1995). Comparative Stylistics of French and English: A Methodology for Translation. John Benjamins.

11. A.R. Zaripova, Special Issue, 01/01/2023. https://kelajakbunyodkori.uz/ Lexico-syntactic way of forming neologisms

12. A.R. Zaripova, Eurasian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences www.geniusjournals.org, Neologisms In Modern Linguistics

13. F.M.MAMATOVA , A.R.ZARIPOVA, SEMANTIC CLASSIFICATION OF ENGLISH NEOLOGISMS

14. Lieber, R., & Štekauer, P. (2023). The Oxford Handbook of Word-Formation. Oxford University Press.

15. Bahri, H., & Mahadi, T. (2022). Neural Machine Translation in Language Learning. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(3), 45–59.

16. Garcia, I. (2010). Is Machine Translation Ready Yet? Language Learning & Technology, 14(1), 108–123.

17. López Rúa, P. (2021). New Words and Medical English: Morphological and Semantic Trends. Lexis Journal in English Lexicology, 19, 55–73.

18. Schmid, H. J. (2022). The Dynamics of the English Lexicon: Innovation and Change. Cambridge University Press.

19. Zhang, L., & Li, Y. (2022). Semantic Change in English Medical Neologisms: A Cognitive Approach. Language and Health Journal, 7(3), 88–102.

20. World Health Organization (2023). Terminology Evolution in Global Health Communication. WHO Publications.

21. Koehn, P. (2020). Neural Machine Translation. Cambridge University Press.

22. Lee, S. (2023). AI-Assisted Language Learning and Pedagogy. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 5123–5140.

23. O'Neill, E. (2019). The Role of Google Translate in Foreign Language Learning. Journal of Language Teaching Research, 5(2), 25–39.

24. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. (2014). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.

25. Oxford English Dictionary (2024). New Medical Entries and Lexical Trends. OED Online.

26. Algeo, J. (1991). Fifty Years Among the New Words: A Dictionary of Neologisms. Cambridge University Press.

Lehrer, A. (2003). Neologisms: Innovation and Productivity in English. Oxford University Press.

27. Groves, M., & Mundt, K. (2015). Friend or Foe? Google Translate in Language Learning. EuroCALL Review, 23(1), 6–16.

28. Crystal, D. (2019). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge University Press.

29. McMahon, A. (2021). Language Change and Linguistic Innovation. Routledge.

30. Oxford Languages Report. (2021). Words of an Unprecedented Year. Oxford University Press.

31. Yule, G. (2020). The Study of Language. Cambridge University Press.

32. WHO Terminology Database. (2022). Medical Terms Related to COVID-19.

33. Merriam-Webster Dictionary. (2023). New Words in Medicine and Health

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.